-
Glass Fused To Steel Tanks (837)
-
Stainless Steel Tanks (434)
-
Fusion Bonded Epoxy Tanks (622)
-
Galvanized Steel Tanks (321)
-
Aluminum Dome Roofs (1336)
-
Wastewater Storage Tanks (280)
-
Welded Steel Tanks (457)
-
Pressure Vessels (295)
-
Anaerobic Digester (202)
-
Industrial Water Tanks (349)
-
Glass Lined Steel Tanks (180)
-
Bolted Steel Tanks (389)
-
Sludge Storage Tank (115)
-
Biogas Storage Tank (173)
-
Leachate Storage Tanks (133)
-
Agricultural Water Storage Tanks (179)
-
Fire Water Tank (166)
-
Grain Storage Silos (146)
-
Biogas Projects (424)
-
Wastewater Treatment Projects (1610)
-
Double Membrane Roof (223)
|
Colocation Data Center Chilled Water Tanks: Shared Infrastructure and Tenant Metering
| Place of Origin: | China |
| Brand Name: | CEC TANKS |
| Certification: | ISO 9001:2008, AWWA D103 , OSHA , BSCI |
| Model Number: | J2016012316 |
| Minimum Order Quantity: | 1set |
| Price: | $5000~$20000 one set |
| Packaging Details: | PE poly-foam between each two steel plates ; wooden pallet and wooden box |
| Delivery Time: | 0-60 days after deposit received |
| Payment Terms: | L/C,T/T |
| Supply Ability: | 60 sets per month |
|
Detail Information |
|||
| Place of Origin | China | Brand Name | CEC TANKS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Certification | ISO 9001:2008, AWWA D103 , OSHA , BSCI | Model Number | J2016012316 |
| Acid And Alkalinity Proof: | Standard Coating Suits For PH3 - PH11, Special Coating Suits For PH1 - PH14 | Elastic: | Same As Steel Sheet , Around 500KN/mm |
| Serive Life: | More Than 30 Years | PH Range: | PH 1 - PH 14 |
| Coating Color: | Dark Blue, Dark Green , White, And Customized | Steel Plates Thickness: | 3mm - 12mm , Depends On The Diameter & Height |
| Easy Yo Clean: | Smooth, Glossy, Inert, Anti-adhesion | Coating Thickness: | 4.0.25mm - 0.4mm, Two Coating Internal And External |
| Highlight: | Colocation Data Center Chilled Water Tanks,Glass Fused Steel Chilled Water Tanks,Shared Infrastructure Tenant Metering Tanks |
||
Product Description
Colocation data centers share cooling infrastructure across tenants, which changes how a chilled water or TES tank is justified and metered. The savings from storage may benefit the operator, not the tenant who pays per kW, so the business case and the tank design both shift. This article covers TES in a shared, multi-tenant context.
In a colo, the operator owns the chiller plant and the tank; tenants buy cooling by allocated kW or by space. A TES tank that shaves the operator's demand charge may not appear on a tenant's bill directly, so the operator carries the capital case. The Singapore buffer tank (2020, 3,462 m3) served a shared process duty, analogous to shared-infrastructure storage, not a data-center project.
- Operator owns plant and tank.
- Tenants metered per allocation.
- Operator carries TES capital case.
- Savings may not reach tenant bill.
For the tank to be defensible, cooling draw must be measurable per tenant. That means metered branches and an allocation rule (by IT load, by floor, or by contract), so the shared reserve is accounted, not assumed. The tank itself is neutral; the metering makes it fair.
- Metered branches per tenant.
- Allocation rule defined up front.
- Shared reserve accounted, not assumed.
- Metering makes the tank fair.
A shared tank serves aggregate load with redundancy for the whole site, sized like a single-tenant plant but with margin for mixed tenant profiles. The Italy Sardinia tank (2025, 30,549 m3) is a large coated tank we delivered for process duty, analogous evidence of build scale, not a data-center project.
- Sized for aggregate site load.
- Margin for mixed tenant profiles.
- Redundancy for whole site.
- Neutral shared asset.
The operator's demand-charge and tariff arbitrage remain the strongest TES drivers; tenant-facing benefits are indirect (stability, capacity headroom). The table contrasts owner versus tenant view.
- Operator: demand charge and tariff.
- Tenant: stability, headroom.
- Indirect tenant benefit.
- Operator holds the case.
View | TES driver | Benefit |
Operator | Demand charge | Lower bill |
Tenant | Stability | Capacity headroom |
Plant | Peak shaving | Smaller chillers |
We have no data-center colocation tank in this library. The shared and large tanks cited (Singapore 3,462 m3, Italy Sardinia 30,549 m3) are analogous industrial and process deliveries, not data-center projects.
- No colo DC tank in library.
- Citations analogous, not claims.
- Shared-duty build is real.
- Metering design needs your spec.
The operator, who owns the shared plant; tenants usually see the benefit indirectly through stability and capacity headroom rather than a direct bill credit.
Through metered branches per tenant and a defined allocation rule (by IT load, floor, or contract) so the shared reserve is accounted.
It serves aggregate site load with margin for mixed tenant profiles, and needs redundancy for the whole site rather than a single tenant.
Mostly indirectly: the operator's demand-charge and tariff savings, plus stability and capacity headroom, are the visible tenant benefits.
Not usually as owners; they benefit as users of the shared plant. Per-tenant TES would require separate, metered loops.
Not in our project library. We cite shared and large tanks at other clients as analogous capability, not data-center deliveries.
Colocation TES is a shared-infrastructure problem: the operator owns the tank and carries the capital case from demand-charge and tariff savings, while tenants benefit indirectly through stability and headroom. The defining design requirement is metering and allocation, so the shared reserve is accounted per tenant rather than assumed. Size for aggregate site load with margin for mixed profiles, and let the metering, not the steel, make the tank fair.
