| Place of Origin: | China |
| Brand Name: | CEC TANKS |
| Certification: | ISO 9001:2008, AWWA D103 , OSHA , BSCI |
| Model Number: | W20160504020 |
| Minimum Order Quantity: | 1set |
| Price: | $5000~$20000 one set |
| Packaging Details: | PE poly-foam between each two steel plates ; wooden pallet and wooden box |
| Delivery Time: | 0-60 days after deposit received |
| Payment Terms: | L/C,T/T |
| Supply Ability: | 60 sets per month |
|
Detail Information |
|||
When a tank supplier claims capability, the reference project is the only evidence that survives scrutiny. But not all references are equal, and not all are relevant. This article shows what a credible dossier contains, how to separate signal from brochure, and - importantly - how to read a supplier’s delivered record honestly when your exact application (a data center) is not in it.
A credible tank reference dossier states capacity, duty, roof, coating test result, completion year, location and, ideally, a client sign-off or photo. When a supplier has no data-center-specific project, the honest move is to read its delivered record in adjacent critical-infrastructure duty - fire water and potable/process water - as proof of the same tank type. Center Enamel’s fire-water and potable tank record (for example UAE Dubai 652 m3 fire water, Indonesia Cilincing 21,088 m3 potable, Italy Sardinia 30,549 m3 process water) is exactly that adjacent evidence, not a claimed data-center install.
A reference should be specific enough to verify: project name or location, country, completion year, total volume, tank count, roof type, the coating and its test result, and the duty. Vague claims like "supplied tanks worldwide" carry no weight; a dated, quantified, duty-matched example does.
|
Field |
What to look for |
Red flag |
|
Volume |
Stated in m3 |
Only "large" |
|
Duty |
Fire / potable / process |
Unspecified |
|
Coating test |
1500 V result noted |
Absent |
|
Year + place |
Dated, located |
Generic |
|
Proof |
Photo / sign-off |
None |
A 30,000 m3 tank in the wrong duty proves less than a correctly specified 300 m3 tank in your duty. For a data center, the relevant duty is fire water and potable/process water, so weight the supplier's record there - even if the end user was not a data center.
If the supplier has not built a data-center tank, do not let it claim one. Instead read its delivered fire-water and potable/process tanks as evidence of the same GFS bolted tank type in critical-infrastructure service. The UAE Dubai fire-water tank (652 m3, 2025), the Indonesia Cilincing potable tanks (21,088 m3, 2024) and the Italy Sardinia process-water tank (30,549 m3, 2025) are real, verifiable, and directly relevant by tank type.
Ask for the coating test record tied to the referenced panels, the design standard basis, and a contactable reference or photo. A supplier confident in its record answers quickly; one that hedges is telling you something.
Center Enamel has delivered 300-plus tank projects across 100-plus countries, with documented fire-water and potable/process references. Where a data-center-specific project does not exist in the record, the company's adjacent critical-infrastructure tank evidence is presented honestly as such, not overstated.
A dated, located, duty-stated, volume-stated example with a coating test result and, ideally, a photo or client sign-off.
Not necessarily; read its fire-water and potable/process references as the same tank type in adjacent duty, and ask for the coating test record.
Relevance - a correctly specified small tank in your duty beats a huge tank in an unrelated one.
The 1500 V holiday-test record by panel number, the design standard basis, and a verifiable photo or reference.
It proves the lining was actually tested for pinholes, which is the single biggest predictor of long life.
Yes, if they are clearly presented as adjacent-duty evidence of the same tank type, not claimed as data-center installs.
A reference project is only as good as its specificity and its relevance. For data centers, read a supplier’s fire-water and potable/process tank record as direct evidence of the tank type you need, demand the coating test record and the design basis, and reject any claim that overstates what was actually delivered.
Suggested CTA: Ask us for our fire-water and potable reference dossiers with volumes, years, roof types and 1500 V test records, presented honestly as adjacent-infrastructure evidence.